Face it, we have. Wine ratings have become as important a component of the wine culture as vintage dates. Robert Parker gave us the 100-point rating scale 30 years ago and it has, for better and for worse, become an industry standard, both revered and reviled - depending where on the scale your wine falls.
For you, the consumer, there is no debating that the scale is a valuable tool, a presumed impartial arbiter helping navigate an endless lineup of labels, bringing an element of democracy to the often overwhelming world of wine.
For us, the producer, the ratings are a duel-edged sword, a beauty when the number is high, a bane when it is not.
We’ve been fortunate here at our Stags’ Leap Ranch. Reviews have been routinely superlative, our wines annually regarded as exceptional. Not that we needed that affirmation. We believe our petite syrahs are consistently superior.
Still, it’s nice when the printed page echoes that belief as it has over and again since we released our 2005 Quixote Petite Syrah.
The Wine Spectator awarded our 2005 Quixote Petite Syrah 93 points, the sixth time in six years it has ranked one of our petite syrahs in its outstanding category, testament to our belief that our Stags’ Leap Ranch is a benchmark for the varietal.
But just for good measure, the Spectator followed up last weekend by spotlighting the wine as a pick of the day on its website.
It said the ’05 is a wine full of personality, dark and rich with flavors that persist on the finish.
Forbes’ Richard Nalley agreed, highlighting the ’05 in a story he wrote, making the case that petite syrah and zinfandel are California’s varietal stars.
“Zin and Petite Syrah rise to heights in California that their ancestor grapes never dreamed of,’’ he wrote. “And it is safe to say that the state can claim them as its own.’’
He was effusive in his evaluation of our wine.
“This Petite Syrah, from organically grown grapes, is as fine as any Carl Doumani has ever presided over,’’ Nalley wrote. “Richly layered, with chewy depths of juicy, dark fruit goodness, it is also smoothly harmonious, a wine that carries its not-considerable weight with the deft freshness of a fine Chateauneuf-du-Pape.’’
As always, experience with any wine is subjective, as individual as a fingerprint. For fun, when we had plenty of wines in our library inventory, I used to play a game with visitors here at the winery. I would pour them our 2002 and 2004 Quixote Petite Syrahs side-by-side and ask them to evaluate each.
I would then ask them which they believed was the highest rated according to Wine Spectator.
More often than not, the choice was the 2002, a rich, earthy petite that still rocks. Of course, this was a setup. The 2002 was awarded 87 points. The 2004 earned a 90.
The point I wanted to emphasize is there is a place for ratings, but nothing or no one should override what your own palate tells you. Your best bet is stick with producers who have proven over the long haul they have an understanding of their vineyard.
We’ll keep you updated with what the rest of the world thinks - flattering and otherwise - but in the meantime the doors are open here, so come and visit and make up your own mind.
And for those who have read this far, a special offer. Call or e-mail us and reference the password ‘Sancho’ and we’ll apply a 10 percent discount to your order.
Cheers


Recent Comments